This file is http://riolinda.info/flood/010816SAFCA.html

Erwin Hayer and State Reclamation Board
re SAFCA's 8/16/01 meeting in Rio Linda:

From: Erwin Hayer [mailto:eeh625@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:10 AM
To: bradley@water.ca.gov
Cc: bltk@aol.com
       RLNEWS@aol.com
       riolinda@vrx.net
Subject: Flood Meeting at RL Grammer School 16 Aug


Mr. Steve Bradley,

    Sorry I have not responded sooner, but I called your office on 17 Aug about some questions I have but you were not available.

    I told John Basset at the August 16, 2001 meeting that I did not get notified about the meeting.  His answer was that I was not impacted by what the meeting was about and it did not affect my home.

    Jay O’Brien called my home the afternoon of August 16 to see if I was prepared to attend the meeting.  I was working and my wife contacted me about Jay’s call.  I then called Jay about 4:30 PM to find out what was going on and he told me about the meeting.  I was able to take off work 2 hours early to arrive at the 6:00 PM meeting by 6:30 PM.

    I have tried to stay current with what is going on with the flooding problems in Rio Linda and Elverta since the floods of 1986.  Getting information from the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) or Roger Dickinson, my representative, has been difficult most of the time.

    I had tried to find out about meetings back when Grantland Johnson (Before SAFCA) was our representative on the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors.  He never did return any of my telephone calls.  Later, when I read about the levees to be constructed in the Sacramento Bee, I took a day of work from my job and went to the SAFCA Offices to find out what the plans were.  When I saw a map with 45.8 feet elevation levees near Rio Linda Boulevard and E Street on the west and Robla Creek near Dry Creek Road on the southeast, I was concerned about the area in between which included Western Acres and Bell Acqua Subdivisions, Rio Linda Airport and Bell Acqua Lakes.  I knew the runway had been raised 6 feet to 42.6 feet elevation on the south end to keep it out of the floods and many of the home floor elevations were less than 44.0 feet.  Now with the 45.8 feet levees, more than 3 feet of water could cover the south end of the runway.  The runway elevation at the north end is 44.3 feet.  I told Paul Devereux that the levees would cause some flooding problems at Western Acres and Bell Acqua Subdivisions, Rio Linda Airport and Bell Acqua Lakes.  He said it would not.  While coming home, I stopped at the Bell Acqua Boat shop to let Bill Mahanah know about the levees.  Phil Todd was there and was also informed about the levees.  I do not have the exact date, but this all took place prior to any construction of the north levee.

    Later, a Public Hearing at the Rio Linda High School on 19 May 1997 was called by SAFCA. Paul Devereux opened the meeting at 7:30 PM and closed the meeting at 7:30 PM.  The one resident of the community that attended did not wish to speak. [http://riolinda.info/flood/970519SAFCA.html] Reference: FSEIR, August 1997, Transcript 2.  Later, when I found out about this meeting, I asked Paul who was notified.  He said it was advertised in the Sacramento Bee and that was all that SAFCA had to do when holding a meeting.  No community members were notified that I could find.

    The Robla Creek south levee was moved north to almost the same location as turned down by the Reclamation Board while denying the Hansen Lakes Project.  This caused the floodway/floodplain width to be reduced more than 600 feet.  Reference “ROBLA FLOODPLAIN PROJECT IS DENIED”, Published on 04/19/1997, Sacramento Bee, Page A1, 772 words.

    When SAFCA had their first Lower Dry Creek Watershed Mitigation Project Working Group meeting on November 19, 1997, more attendees were from SAFCA and SAFCA Consultants than attendees from the community.  The meeting was held at 9:00 AM and most community members worked during the day.  All of the community attendees ask if the meetings could be held in the evening so more community residents could attend and SAFCA said no.  This was not entered into the minutes of the meeting and was again brought up at the second meeting on January 13, 1998.  SAFCA still planned the future meetings for 9:00 AM.

    I brought up the fact that if the floodwater depth west of Dry Creek Road was increased by the Robla Creek South Levee, then the floodwater would rise on the east side.  Paul Devereux then said that the floodwater would not increase on the east side of Dry Creek Road and the project ended at Dry Creek Road.  I then notified some of the residents east of Dry Creek Road and they had not known about the plans for the levee.

    Later SAFCA had a meeting in the evening with the residents east of Dry Creek Road with out notifying any of the residents that had been attending the day meetings.  Is this divide and conquer?

    Jay O'Brien told me later after the August 16, 2001 meeting that he mentioned to you that he had notified me of the meeting, and Mr. O'Brien quoted you as saying that you had specifically asked SAFCA to notify me. Did Mr. O'Brien hear you correctly?

    If this is true, then SAFCA is still operating as to divide and conquer.

    The above are some of the many reasons why I do not trust the SAFCA Staff and the SAFCA Board of Directors.

Sincerely,
 
Erwin E. Hayer
950 G Street
Rio Linda.CA 95673-4315
(916) 991-5940  Fax: (916) 991-1180


- - - - - - - Reply from Steve Bradley - - - - - - -
From: "Steve Bradley" <bradley@water.ca.gov>
To: "Erwin Hayer" <eeh625@hotmail.com>
CC: "Pete Rabbon \(E-mail\)" <prabbon@water.ca.gov>
Subject: RE: Flood Meeting at RL Grammer School 16 Aug
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 08:05:24 -0700


Mr. Hayer,

I did ask SAFCA to notify you of the meeting on August 16.  I told SAFCA to notify all of the people (affected or not) in the area east of Dry Creek Road and to include you as you had been heavily involved in the public meeting process for the Robla/Dry Creek Project.

Stephen T. Bradley
Chief Engineer
The Reclamation Board

(916) 653-8089